Factors to Consider When it Comes to Cryptocurrency Regulation

Factors to Consider When it Comes to Cryptocurrency Regulation

To prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, there are several key factors to consider when it comes to cryptocurrency regulation. Regulatory sandboxes and global coordination are two of the most important steps, as they ensure that countries are meeting their obligations to prevent the flow of cryptocurrencies. These factors may be difficult to determine, however. Listed below are some key aspects to consider when deciding on the most effective regulatory framework for your cryptocurrency. But first, what should you avoid?

Regulatory sandboxes

Regulatory sandboxes are supervised environments in which crypto-firms can conduct their development. The sandboxes are created for the purpose of auditing and managing risks associated with the crypto assets sector. In other words, they serve as a safe haven for cryptocurrency-firms and their users. Regulatory sandboxes are not yet legally binding, but the concept is well worth pursuing.

Regulators that implement regulatory sandboxes have a number of challenges. One of these challenges is ensuring that participants can test new rules and regulations without being held back. The sandbox environment is a controlled environment where regulators can try out new rules and regulations in a safe and controlled environment. This is especially important for new crypto projects, which are often subject to heavy regulatory scrutiny.

Global coordination

There is a need for a global coordinated approach to cryptocurrency regulation, a demand that is being voiced by European commissioner for financial services, financial stability, and the capital markets union, Mairead McGuinness. The commissioner, writing in an op-ed in the Sunday newspaper The Hill, pointed to risks associated with the use of digital assets, such as insider trading and the environment. However, the potential for abuse of Digital assets is also a major concern.

In December 2017, the G20 leaders issued a communique calling for cryptocurrency regulation. The communique did not call for a crackdown on the industry, but rather suggested a global investigation. G20 members stressed that the technological innovation that underpins cryptocurrencies will be of great value to the global financial system. However, they did note concerns related to tax evasion, investor protection, money laundering, and volatility. The communique is far from the first attempt at cryptocurrency regulation.


The regulatory frameworks for ICOs and cryptocurrencies are evolving. Regulators are realising the opportunities these new technologies present in achieving policy objectives. As an alternative form of capital raising, ICOs are a promising alternative to traditional fundraising. While these new structures have a low level of regulatory oversight, they may still be the best way to finance an ICO. Listed companies should take into account the regulatory frameworks for ICOs before launching a new one.

First, entities must ensure that they are compliant with the relevant Australian laws. This includes anti-money laundering and know-your-client obligations. Additionally, promoters must ensure that they are not engaging in misleading conduct and have the necessary regulatory requirements in place. Seek legal or professional advice before launching an ICO. This way, they can avoid legal problems and comply with the law. These regulations are necessary to protect consumers and the integrity of Australia’s financial market.


Despite the massive growth of the crypto currency market, the monetary authorities are still unsure of how to regulate stablecoins. Despite many promises, governments have so far done little to regulate stablecoins. Failure to regulate this industry will make it harder for advocates to promote the use of stablecoins, and it will expose consumers to risk and volatility. But regulations are necessary to protect consumers and ban the practice of excessive risk, and they will also unlock the potential of stablecoins. While they are still in their infancy, they are poised to change the world’s economy.

The FSOC may designate stablecoin issuers as financial market utilities, which subject them to greater supervision and require them to disclose any changes to their operations. These entities typically move large amounts of payments and are therefore subject to heightened regulatory standards. Some of these entities include the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the National Securities Clearing Corporation. These organizations also have jurisdiction over the stablecoin market. Stablecoins have many advantages over traditional currencies and will be easier to use.


As the CFTC begins to oversee the growing crypto market, Congress is giving the agency an opportunity to clarify its role. In a spat with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the CFTC Commissioner, Dawn DeBerry Stump, stated that “cryptocurrencies are neither commodities nor securities.” This is an important distinction to make in regulating the digital assets. There is also a risk that the CFTC could sabotage the industry by allowing companies to operate without the proper regulatory oversight.

The SEC has had a limited role in the cryptocurrency industry, and it typically only oversees institutions that used it as a means of payment. The CFTC, however, has a wider role, regulating the market as a whole. The SEC’s role in cryptocurrency regulation is limited, however, after BitMEX’s recent arrest. In the meantime, the CFTC is overseeing the crypto exchanges.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *